This Court directed the Tahasildar, Chikiti, to decide on the petitioner's dispute resolution request under Sections 7(2) and 8-A of the O.P.L.E. Act within four months, disposing of the writ petition.
Directed Tahasildar, Chikiti to decide the petitioner's request under the O.P.L.E. Act within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.9684 of 2019
Considering that the Tahasildar has the power for settlement of the dispute by resorting to the provision under Sections 7(2) and 8-A of the O.P.L.E. Act, this Court directs the Tahasildar, Chikiti-opposite party no.4 to look into the request of the petitioner vide Annexure-5 series and take a decision thereon following the provision under the O.P.L.E Act within a period of four months from the date of communication of a certified copy of this order by the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of with the observation and direction made hereinabove.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
…….…………………
(Biswanath Rath, J.)
Ayas
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tahasildar has the power to settle the dispute under Sections 7(2) and 8-A of the O.P.L.E. Act.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Tahasildar, Chikiti
State
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
