Jadunath Panda v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.7881 of 2008
9 17.12.2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Mohapatra, learned counsel for opposite parties no.1 and 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner by filing a memo in Court today states that the petitioner does not want to press this writ petition and wants to withdraw the writ petition. The memo be kept on record.
In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
…………………….…
Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J
Alok
B.R. Sarangi
Alok
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court