Dismissed
Suraj Deo Prasad v. Learned Judge
Orissa HCWP(C)/3589/2003
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
None appears for the petitioner at the time…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P. No.1360 of 2015 W.P.(C).No.3589 of 2003
4 21.11.2019 None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party is present in Court. The matter is pending since 2003. It seems the petitioner has no interest in the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order dated 13.6.2003 passed by this Court stands vacated.
�����������. BISWANATH RATH,J
sks
Petitioner
Learned Counsel for the opposite party
BISWANATH RATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court