Lutheran Mahila v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
13.12.2019 Heard leaned counsel for the…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.2381 of 2002
Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the age of the child, who is presently become major, this Court finds, the prayer made in this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Hence no decision under the provision of Section 9(4) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 can be issued in the matter. Accordingly this Writ Petition stands dismissed.
.…….……………..… Biswanath Rath, J.
Ayas
1 provisions across 1 enactments
W.P.(C) No.2381 of 2002
Respondent
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court