Considering the rival contentions of the parties, this Court finds, filing of the present Writ Petition is an outcome of inaction of the University in spite of there being no impediment in working out the direction in Annexure-10. As this Court finds, there is no impediment in working out the direction vide Annexure-10, there could not have been any obstruction in implementing the same in spite of pendency of the present Writ Petition. Ground taken by the authorities of the University that they are unable to take decision for pendency of present writ petition is no ground to deal with the case as the Writ Petition seeks a direction for implementation of the order vide Annexure-10 and there involves no challenge to the same. In the circumstance and for there being no legal impediments in working out the direction by the Utkal University, this matter stands disposed of with a direction to the opposite party no.1 to work out the direction contained in Annexure-10 as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of communication of a certified copy of this order by the learned counsel for the Utkal University. Since there is unnecessary withholding of the benefit accrued to the petitioner from 2012 and compelling the petitioner to approach this Court for no fault of him, this Court while directing the authority to release the arrear in favour of the petitioner along with interest @ 8 % per annum all through, also imposes a cost of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two thousand) towards litigation cost on the Utkal University, which is to be paid to the petitioner along with other
