Considering the contentions raised by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the record, admittedly, an advertisement was issued for filling up of the post of Anganwadi Helper in respect of Pathapaka-4 Anganwadi Center. Allegation of the petitioner, that the CDPO, Kakaptpur has violated all norms and guidelines circulated by the Government in W & C.D. Department, is not correct, in view of the fact that in the guideline, it has been clearly mentioned that to be eligible for selection as Helper for Anganwadi Centre, the applicant must be a lady of the locality and acceptable to the Anganwadi Worker and, as such, though the Orissa Reservation of Vacancy Rules (ORV) is not applicable for the selection to in the villages predominantly occupied by the SC, ST and OBC population, the Helper selected may be from the community which is in majority. The petitioner and opposite party no.4 both belonged to the scheduled caste category. But only question raised before this Court is that opposite party no.4 does not belong to Anganwadi Center area in Ward No.11. This contention was also raised before the appellate authority, but nothing has been placed on record that opposite party no.4 does not belong to Anganwadi Center area i.e. Ward No. 11, rather it is fortified that the petitioner is residing in Angnawadi Center area i.e. Ward No. 11. Though she married to Babaji Swain of Ward No.9, but after his death
