Dismissed
Madhaba Nanda Nath v. Dfo,Angul Kendu Leaves Division,Angul
Orissa HCWP(C)/22324/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 22324 of 2018
02 04.04.2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Since the petitioner claims benefit under the State Government, this writ petition is not maintainable. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move the appropriate forum ventilating his grievance.
With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.
…………………………..
Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J
Ajaya
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
State Government
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court