order, the Collector & District Magistrate, Nayagarh while passing the impugned order dated 06.01.2009 contended that as per the condition stipulated in the engagement order, no Sikshya Sahayk can be removed from engagement without giving 30 days prior notice, if he/she violates the conditions of the contract of is considered unsuitable later on by the authorities or on the basis of the report of VEC. Nothing has been shown indicating that the petitioner is declared unsuitable for the post by any of the authorities or any adverse remarks was made by the VEC against the petitioner, therefore, disengagement order passed against the petitioner cannot have any justification. It is contended that while issuing engagement order in favour of the petitioner, the authority has not followed the ORV Act, therefore, the engagement of the petitioner is illegal and if the appointment of the petitioner is illegal, then in that case there is no requirement of giving any opportunity of hearing while terminating the service of the petitioner. But this fact cannot have any basis at all in view of the fact that there is no rule with regard to compliance of principle of natural justice. Once a person has been appointed, he has got every right to continue in the said post. If the authority wants to disengage a person from service then the immediate requirement of law is that principle of natural justice is to be followed, may it be illegal appointment or irregular appointment. The order
