Dismissed
Simanchal Digal v. State
Orissa HCWP(C)/20176/2010
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court dismissed the writ petition claiming green card incentive due to want of prosecution as no advocate appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the time of call.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
WP(C) No. 20176 of 2010
¶2
- 18.06.2019 None appears for the petitioner at the time of call.
¶3
Perused the record.
¶4
The petitioner files this writ application claiming for green card incentive.
¶5
Since none is there on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶6
GDS
¶7
DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the writ petition filed for green card incentive can be prosecuted in the absence of appearance.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
Coram
AI extract
DR. B.R. SARANGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court