Taruni Patel v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Heard learned counsel for the parties. The…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 20160 OF 2012
The petitioner has filed this writ application seeking direction to the opposite parties for approval of her post.
Mr. D.K. Pani, learned Addl. Standing Counsel states that the writ application is not maintainable in view of Section 24-B of the Orissa Education Act.
In view of such submission, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ application and the same is accordingly disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum.
GDS
…………….………..…… (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ application seeking direction for approval of post is maintainable.
Whether Section 24-B of the Orissa Education Act bars the maintainability of the writ application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Opposite parties
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court