Bana Bihari Das v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a writ petition without expressing an opinion on merits, directing the opposite party to consider the petitioner's representation within three months.
What did the court decide?
Directed opposite party No.5 to consider representation and pass order within three months.
What the court decided
W.P.(C) No.19622 OF 2009
03. 12.12.2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The petitioner has filed this application seeking direction to the opposite parties to sell the possessed property in the name of the petitioner at the price prescribed in the Uniform Policy in Annexure-1 by accepting the consideration money.
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to the opposite party no.5 vide Annexure-6, but no decision has yet been taken.
Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.5 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-6 and pass appropriate order within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.
Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.
Ashok
…………….…………… (DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent should be directed to consider the petitioner's representation regarding the sale of possessed property.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Petitioner
- respondent
Opposite Party No.5
Coram
DR. B.R. SARANGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court