Jharana Sahoo v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners failed to appear. The writ petition to quash re-constitution proceedings was disposed of as infructuous due to the efflux of time.
What the court decided
W.P.(C) No. 14710 of 2009
- 11.12.2019 None appears for the petitioners at the time of call.
Mr. P.K. Panda, learned Standing Counsel for School and Mass Education Department.
The petitioner has filed this application to quash the proceeding/resolution of the meeting dated 30.09.2009 and declare that the re-constitution of opposite party no.4 as illegal.
With efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous, accordingly, the same stands disposed of as such.
Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J.
Ajaya
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
None
- other
School and Mass Education Department
Coram
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court