Writ petition for differential arrear salary under ORSP Rule-2017 disposed without merits; petitioner directed to file representation decision within three months.
Direct opposite party to decide petitioners' representation and pass appropriate order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 18580 of 2019
02 01.10.2019
Heard Mr. S.B. Biswal, learned counsel for the petitioners.
The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking for a direction to opposite parties to release the differential revised arrear salary of the petitioners w.e.f. 01.01.2016 to 30.09.2017 under ORSP Rule-2017, which came into force 01.01.2016 under Annexure-2 and as per Rule 9 of the Orissa Education (Recruitment etc.) Rules, 1974 within a stipulated period.
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners states that highlighting the grievance, the petitioners have made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-5, but no decision has yet been taken. Therefore, the same may be considered in the light of the judgment passed by this Court in Smt. Dipti Roy v. State of Orissa and others, 2004 (II) OLR 718 and Bijay Ketan Khatua v. State of Orissa and others, 2015(I) OLR 452.
Considering the limited grievance of the petitioners, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court disposes of this writ petition directing opposite party no.1 to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioners vide Annexure-5 in the light of the judgments in Smt. Dipti Roy and Bijay Ketan Khatua (supra) and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.
Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.
Alok
.………………………….
Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. Dipti Roy v. State of Orissa and othersReferred¶5
Smt. Dipti Roy v. State of Orissa and others, 2004 (II) OLR 718
Bijay Ketan Khatua v. State of Orissa and othersReferred¶5
Bijay Ketan Khatua v. State of Orissa and others, 2015(I) OLR 452
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioners
Opposite Party No. 1
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
Parties & counsel
