Dismissed
Subash Ch.Garnaik v. Syndicate Bank
Orissa HCWP(C)/15568/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
None appears for the petitioner at the time…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(C) No. 15568 of 2010
1
no.1 and 2 is present.
Since none is there on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute, the writ application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
……………………..……
Dr. B.R. Sarangi,J.
GDS
Petitioner
Opposite Parties No. 1 and 2
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court