Ranjan v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution on 15.05.2019 as no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
What the court decided
OJC No. 2450 of 1996
22 15.05.2019
None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. Mr. S.K. Nayak-1, learned counsel for opposite parties no. 3 and 4 and Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned Addl. Government Advocate are present.
Since none is there to prosecute the matter, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution
.….……………………
Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J
Ajaya
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ajaya
- respondent
Opposite party no. 3
- respondent
Opposite party no. 4
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court