Petitioners had no instruction. Opposite party claimed death of Atul Krushna Mishra and a settlement was arrived at. The writ petition was dismissed for want of instruction. A linked Special Appeal was delinked and listed separately.
Writ petition dismissed for want of instruction. Linked Special Appeal delinked and listed separately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.J.C. No.13109 of 2000
Miss Goutami Budhapriya, learned counsel for opposite party no.1 submits that opposite party no.1-Atul Krushna Mishra has died in the meantime and there is a settlement arrived at between the parties.
In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed for want of instruction.
S.A. No.118 of 1998 be delinked from this file and the same may be listed separately.
K.R. MOHAPATRA,J.
jm
Petitioner(s)
Opposite Party no.1 (Atul Krushna Mishra)
K.R. MOHAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
