Petitioner sought directive for C.T. training for the 2010 academic session. The court held the petition infructuous due to selection completion and elapsed time.
The writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 16665 of 2010
The petitioner has filed this application seeking direction to the opposite parties to send him for C.T. training for the session 2010 along with the candidates alredy gone for such purpose.
Since the selection has already been over for the academic session 2010, with efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
Ashok
…………….…………… (DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition deserves direction for C.T. training.
Petitioner
Opposite parties
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
