Dismissed
Akshya Kumar Pradhan v. Sabita Pradhan
Orissa HCCMP/953/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2017 7 c 20.12.2018 On instructions…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.953 of 2017
7 20.12.2018
On instructions, Mr.Pattnaik, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that in the meantime, MAT Case No.17 of 2006 has been disposed of. Thus, the petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
……………………… Dr.A.K.Rath, J.
c
c
Dr. A.K. Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court