Sarita Narnolia v. Utkal Gramya Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner did not appear. The Bank submitted that the petitioner's loan accounts were settled and instalments fixed. The court disposed of both writ petitions as infructuous.
The petitioner did not appear. The Bank submitted that the petitioner's loan accounts were settled and instalments fixed. The court disposed of both writ petitions as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPC NOS.7365 & 23537 OF 2012
11.09.2017
None appears for the petitioner when the matters are called.
Learned counsel for the opposite parties-Bank submits that the loan accounts of the pet
itioner have already been settled for Rs.1.31 crores and necessary instalments have been fixed
for payment of the same, as per the letter of the Bank dated 21.8.2017.
In view of such submission made by the learned counsel for the opposite parties-Bank, b
oth the writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous.
(S.C.PARIJA, J.)
(D.DASH,J.)2
Petitioner
Bank
S.C. Parija
D.D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court