Disposed
Surjit Sahoo v. B.M.,S.B.I
Orissa HCWP(C)/9726/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on the submission that the petitioner's loan account was settled and closed. The interim order was vacated.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(C) No.9726 of 2012
¶2
4. 8.9.2017 None appears for the petitioner when the matter is cal
¶3
led.
¶4
Sri D.P.Sarangi, learned counsel appearing for the opp.party-Bank on i
nstruction submits that the loan account of the petitioner has already been settled by way of
compromise and the same has been closed. Therefore, no further cause of action survives.
In view of such submission made by learned counsel for the opp.party-B
ank, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
¶5
Interim order dated 23.5.2012 stands vacated.
¶6
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
¶7
S.C. Parija, J.
¶8
D. Dash, J.
¶9
Aks
¶10
2
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Bank
Coram
AI extract
S.C. Parija
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court