Dismissed
Urja Udyog v. Union of India
Orissa HCWP(C)/6977/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Due to the non-appearance of the petitioner on call, the writ petition was dismissed. The court held that the prayer made did not deserve to be granted in the writ jurisdiction.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(C) No. 6977 of 2005
¶2
06. 23.03.2017 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even on revised
call.
¶3
Having heard Mr. N.C. Sahoo and Mr. B. Nayak, learned counsel for the
opposite parties and on perusal of record, we are of the opinion that in the facts of the case
, prayer made in this case does not deserve to be granted in the writ jurisdiction.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
¶4
....... ( VINEET SARAN )
¶5
CHIEF JUSTICE
¶6
..
( DR. B.R.SARANGI )
¶7
JUDGE
¶8
-2-
Coram
AI extract
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R.SARANGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court