Dismissed
Laxmi Narayan Sahu v. State
Orissa HCWP(C)/19571/2010
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A single-paragraph order dismissing a writ petition where the petitioner was absent. The court held that the prayer does not deserve to be granted in the writ jurisdiction.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(C) No. 19571 of 2010
¶2
03. 23.03.2017 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even on revised
call.
¶3
Having heard learned Government Advocate appearing for State-opposite
parties, Mr. S.P. Sarangi, learned counsel for the opposite party no.4 and on perusal of recor
d, we are of the opinion that in the facts of the case, prayer made in this case does not dese
rve to be granted in the writ jurisdiction.
¶4
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
¶5
....... ( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
¶6
..
( DR. B.R.SARANGI )
JUDGE
¶7
-2-
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
State-opposite parties
Coram
AI extract
VINEET SARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court