The Court rejected a miscellaneous case seeking modification of an order after hearing counsel. The petitioner alleged payment was made while the opposite party denied it. The judge found no merit in the application and dismissed it.
The miscellaneous case petition was rejected on the ground of no merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 6735 of 2014
Misc. Case No 12.02. 17022 of 20172018Heardlearned counsel for the petitioner in the Misc. Case petition and lear
ned counsel for the opp. party.
Learned counsel for the petitioner-OSFC submits that they have already paid the amount
to the present opp. Party and therefore, he seeks modification of order dated 10.8.2017.
Mr. Sarangi, learned counsel appearing for the opp. Party (petitioner in the writ appl
ication) submits that there is no basis in the application since no payment has been made as d
irected.
In view of the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for both sides, I find no meri
t in the Misc. case, which is accordingly rejected.
dnp
D.P.Choudhury, J.
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether theMisc. Case should be modified after partial payment asserted by the petitioner.
OSFC
Opp. Party in Misc. Case
Petitioner in Writ Application
D.P. Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court