In Misc. Case No. 12.02.17019 of 20172018, the Court rejected the petitioner's application for modification of an order dated 10.8.2017. The petitioner claimed payment was made, while the opponent denied it; the Court found no merit in the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 6732 of 2014
Misc. Case No 12.02. 17019 of 20172018Heardlearned counsel for the petitioner in the Misc. Case petition and lear
ned counsel for the opp. party.
Learned counsel for the petitioner-OSFC submits that they have already paid the amount
to the present opp. Party and therefore, he seeks modification of order dated 10.8.2017.
Mr. Sarangi, learned counsel appearing for the opp. Party (petitioner in the writ appl
ication) submits that there is no basis in the application since no payment has been made as d
irected.
In view of the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for both sides, I find no meri
t in the Misc. case, which is accordingly rejected.
dnp
D.P.Choudhury, J.
2
Opp. Party (petitioner in the writ application)
OSFC
D.P. Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court