Dismissed
Sarat Kumar Das v. State
Orissa HCWP(C)/6487/2003
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The dismissed writ petition where no petitioner appeared. The court held the prayer did not deserve to be granted in the writ jurisdiction on perusal of the record.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(C) No. 6487 of 2003
¶2
06. 09.03.2017 No one is present on behalf of the petitioners even on revised
call.
Having heard learned Government Advocate appearing for the State-opposite part
ies and on perusal of record, we are of the opinion that in the facts of the case, prayer made
in this case does not deserve to be granted in the writ jurisdiction.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
¶3
....... ( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
..
( DR. B.R.SARANGI )
JUDGE
¶4
-2-
Coram
AI extract
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R.SARANGI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court