Dismissed
Smrutimayee Das v. State
Orissa HCWP(C)/4455/2007
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed on default as petitioner's counsel was absent on revised call and the petitioners信息显示 they no longer wish to pursue the case.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(C) No. 4455 of 2007
¶2
03. 08.03.2017 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even on revised
call.
¶3
Sri A.K. Pande, learned counsel appearing for School and Mass Education Depart
ment is present.
By order dated 3.5.2007, this Court directed that the representation of the pe
titioner be decided in the meantime. It appears that the petitioner no longer is interested in
pursuing her case.
¶4
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶5
....... ( VINEET SARAN )
¶6
CHIEF JUSTICE
¶7
-2-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the writ petition should be decided on merits or dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
School and Mass Education Department
- other
Chief Justice
Coram
AI extract
VINEET SARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court