Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution on 05.01.2017 due to absence of petitioners' counsel. Prior interim order of 21.12.2012 was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) NO. 24688 OF 2012
05. 01.11.2017 None appears on behalf of the petitioners at the time of call.
Learned counsel for the opposite party is present.
The order dated 10.10.2017 reveals that the matter had been directed t
o be listed for hearing on merit on consent of the learned counsels for the parties keeping in
view that the age of the proceeding and pendency of the suit since the year 2011 without any
progress awaiting adjudication of the dispute in view of the interim order passed by this Cour
t on 21.12.2012.
In the above premises, this writ application stands dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Interim order dated 21.12.2012 stands vacated.
D. Dash, J.
Narayan
// 2 //
Petitioners
Opposite party
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court