Disposed

Ashutosh Sahoo v. Chairman Chse Odisha

Orissa HC6 Jan 2017WP(C)/21755/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court heard a writ petition regarding the petitioner's grievance over imputed marks in his +2 Science Annual Examination. The court observed the representation was general and directed the respondent authority to dispose of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to opposite parties to consider the writ application on merits if a detailed representation regarding specific mark discrepancies is filed within three weeks.

02. 06.01.2017 The grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been properly award ed with the marks in Mathematics and Hindi papers of +2 Science Annual Examination, 2016. It i s stated that inspite of re-checking, there has been no improvement and the marks as have been awarded are not correct.

As is seen from the writ application and also the representation made by the p etitioner to the opposite parties under Annexure -5. There is no specific averment as to in wh ich of the answers there has been improper award of marks. It is started in a general manner t hat on same answers no mark has been awarded an on some less.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in continuation of the represe ntation under Annexure -5, the petitioner would further place the detail representation pointi ng out the deficiency in award of marks in respect of those answers in the two papers for cons ideration of the authority and needful action if any. So, he prays for disposal of the writ ap plication accordingly.

Learned counsel for the opposite parties contends that re-checking having alre ady been made and no such discrepancy having been noticed, re-evaluation is not permissible on such general allegation. He of course fairly contends that in case no such mark has been awar ded to any answer or there has been total omission to consider any answer in giving marks, in case the detail representation on such score is received, the authority would do well to look into the matter in redressing the grievance of the petitioner if so found just and proper. Considering the submissions and in view of the limited grievance of the petiti oner, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the opposite parties in the even t the petitioner files a detail representation within a period of three weeks hence as aforesa id, the same would be considered on its own merit and disposed of in accordance with law withi n a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order or production of its cer tified copy whichever is earlier.

Ashutosh Sahoo v. Chairman Chse Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashutosh Sahoo v. Chairman Chse Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manisha Purohit Vs State of Orissa

Bharat Naik Vs State of Orissa

Swaraj Mohanty Vs State and Ors.

Md.Irfan@Sahid Yusuf Vs State of Orissa

Pankaj Mandal Vs State of Orissa

Swapana Sagar Barik Vs State of Orissa