The Single Judge held that the petition gone through, those no more survive for consideration, accordingly the writ application stands dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) NO. 17445 OF 2015
03. 11.01.2017 Heard Mr. S.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and
Mr. B. Dash, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1 are present. On going through the p
etition averments as well as viewing the grievance sought to have been redressed and the praye
r as advanced, it also appears that those no more survive for consideration.
Accordingly, the writ application stands dismissed as infructuous.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court