Dismissed
Nanda Kishore v. O.S.F.C.
Orissa HCOJC/4334/1999
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear even on a revised call and confirmed via counsel that they did not wish to press the petition.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
O.J.C. No. 4334 of 1999
¶2
06. 10.03.2017 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even on revised
call.
¶3
Sri B.K. Das, learned counsel for opposite party no.1 is present and states th
at he has been informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner does not
wish to press this petition.
¶4
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶5
....... ( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
¶6
..
( DR. B.R.SARANGI )
JUDGE
¶7
-2-
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Opposite Party No.1
Coram
AI extract
Vineet Saran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court