Dismissed
Niranjan dash v. Collector
Orissa HCOJC/2579/1998
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. 2579 of 1998 04. 21.03.2017 No one is…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.J.C. No. 2579 of 1998
04. 21.03.2017 No one is present on behalf of the petitioners even on revised
call.
Having heard learned Government Advocate appearing for the State-opposite part
ies and on perusal of record, we are of the opinion that in the facts of the case, prayer made
in this case does not deserve to be granted in the writ jurisdiction.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
....... ( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
..
( DR. B.R.SARANGI )
JUDGE
DA
-2-
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court