Petitioners requested and were granted permission to withdraw the present CRLMC. The withdrawn petition was dismissed.
Permission granted to withdraw the CRLMC; earlier interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLMC No.3079 of 2009
08.05.2017
Mr. Anup Kumar Bose, the learned Assistant Solicitor General of India enters appearanc
e in this case on behalf of the opposite party and files his Memo of Appearance. The same be k
ept on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not want to procee
d with the matter and, as such, they may be permitted to withdraw this CRLMC.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this
CRLMC stands dismissed being withdrawn.
Interim order dated 27.10.2009 passed in Misc. Case No.2558 of 2009 stands vacated. A copy of this order be communicated to the Court below forthwith.2
Petitioners
Opposite Party
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court