Hirakud Rice Mills v. Employees S.Ins.Corp
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Miscellaneous application dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLMC No. 1538 of 2004
10.04.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instruction in the matter.
Learned counsel for the opp.party is present. Since nobody is there to place the matter
on behalf of the petitioner, the CRLMC application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
S.K.Sahoo,J.
2
2
S.K. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court