Disposed
Dasarathi Khatei v. State
Orissa HCCRLA/88/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Disposal of a criminal appeal where the appellant, also involved in another case, sought withdrawal of the present appeal. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the matter.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Appeal is disposed of.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
CRLA No.88 of 2013
10.04.2017 As prayed for by the learned previous engaged counsel that the names of Mr. Pr
asanta Kumar Sahoo, U.C. Dora, S.P. Moharana and A.K. Nayak be deleted from the cause list hen
ceforth.
¶2
Prayer is allowed.
¶3
Another memo has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellant for withd
¶4
rawal.
¶5
Perused the memo.
¶6
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that since the appellant Dasarathi K
hatei is also an appellant in Criminal Appeal No.662 of 2012, he does not want to press this C
riminal Appeal.
¶7
Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is disposed of.
¶8
3
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Dasarathi KHatei
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court