In a contempt proceeding under Contempt No.2991 of 2012, the petitioner was absent. The opposing party submitted a show-cause affidavit confirming compliance with a prior order. The bench dropped the proceedings.
Content proceeding dropped due to absence of petitioner and filing of affidavit showing compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTC No.2991 of 2012
08.09.2017
None appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called.
Heard learned counsel for the School & Mass Education Department, Bhubaneswar,
Opposite Party No.1.
Show-cause affidavit has been filed by the DEO, Kendrapara, Opposite Party No.
3, wherein it is stated that the order passed in W.P.(C) No.6533 of 2008 has already been comp
lied with and documents in respect of such compliance have already been annexed.
Therefore, we dropped the contempt proceeding.
B.K.Nayak, J.
Dr. D.P. Choudhury, J.
2
None
School & Mass Education Department, Bhubaneswar
DEO, Kendrapara
B.K.Nayak
Dr. D.P. Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court