Another application for anticipatory bail in a criminal case involving I.P.C. offences was rejected as not a fit case for reconsideration, following prior refusal.
Application for anticipatory bail rejected and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABLAPL No.3688 of 2017
3. 15.11.2017 Heard.
The petitioner has approached this Court for the second time for grant of bail
in the event of his arrest in connection with G.R. Case No.372 of 2016 arising out of Udala P
.S. Case No.167 of 2016 pending in the Court of the learned S.D.J.M., Udala registered for all
eged commission of offence punishable under sections 147/148/294/325/307/109/506/149, I.P.C. E
arlier his prayer for anticipatory bail has been rejected in ABLAPL No.17441 of 2016 holding i
t to be not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in view of the materia
ls available on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the meantime a numb
er of accused persons have already been released on bail and the same, therefore, be taken as
the changed circumstances for reconsideration of the prayer for anticipatory bail to the petit
ioner.
Learned Additional Government Advocate opposes the move in view of the
earlier rejection of the self same prayer.
Considering the submissions made, this Court finds that the prayer made in the
petition does not merit consideration, which is accordingly rejected.
The ABLAPL is accordingly dismissed.
D. Dash, J.
H
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a second application for anticipatory bail based on changed circumstances merits reconsideration after prior refusal.
Petitioner
State
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court