In absence of any rule or regulation for re-evaluation, the Court held it was not possible to issue a direction to opposite parties and dismissed the writ petition seeking reassessment of +2 Science Examination 2015 answer scripts.
Direction to opposite parties to reassess and recheck answer scripts was not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.6808 of 2016
19.05.2016
The prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition is for a direction to the opposite p
arties to reassess and recheck the answer scripts in respect of +2 Science Examination, 2015.
In the absence of any rule or regulation for re-evaluation of the answer scrip
ts, it is not possible to issue any direction to the opposite parties to re-evaluate the answe
r scripts.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
pm
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court can direct re-evaluation of answer scripts in the absence of rules/regulations?
Petitioner
Opposite Parties
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court