Dismissed
Kumudini Biswal v. State
Orissa HCWP(C)/23959/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Supreme Court permitted the withdrawal of a writ petition as it had become infructuous due to the petitioner's engagement. The petition was dismissed accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(C) No.23959 of 2014
¶2
02. 05.08.2016 It has been submitted by Mr. T.R. Meher, learned counsel repre
senting the petitioner that the writ petition has become infructuous since the petitioner has
already been engaged, as such prayer has been made to withdraw this writ petition.
¶3
He has filed memo to that effect.
¶4
Learned counsel for opposite party State has got no objection.
¶5
In view thereof the case is permitted to be withdrawn.
¶6
Accordingly, the case is dismissed as withdrawn being infructuous.
¶7
Office is directed to keep the memo dtd.5.8.2016 on record.
¶8
... S.N. Prasad, J.
¶9
mkp
2
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
S.N. Prasad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court