Partly allowed

D.Kasi Rao v. Collector,Ganjam

Orissa HC19 May 2016WP(C)/2070/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a miscellaneous application, this court allowed the prayer to correct the description of Opposite Party No.3 in the cause title and the earlier order dated 19.05.2016 due to an inadvertent error regarding their address from Gopalpur-On-Sea to Bhubaneswar.

What did the court decide?

Prayer to correct the cause title and the order dated 19.05.2016 regarding the address of Opposite Party No.3 allowed. The case is disposed of after this modification.

D.Kasi Rao Vs Collector,Ganjam — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2016)

¶1

 W.P.C NO.2070 OF 2016

¶2

 Misc. Case No.9954 of 2016
 24.06.2016

¶3

 This application has been filed for modification of the order dated 19.05.2016.
 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Government Advoc
ate and learned Asst. Solicitor General for opposite party no.3.
 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the address of opposite
 party no.3 has been wrongly mentioned in the cause title of the writ petition as Asst. Defenc
e Estate Officer, Gopalpur-On-Sea, Dist-Ganjam instead of Defence Estate Officer, 73 (F/F), Su
rya Nagar, Unit-VII, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, the said wrong address has been reflected in paragra
ph-4 of the order dated 19.05.2016. She further submits that the same being an inadvertent one
, she may be permitted to correct the cause title and the order dated 19.05.2016 may be correc
ted accordingly.

¶4

 Prayer is allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to correc
t the description of opposite party no.3 in the cause title of the writ petition in Court toda
y. In 4th paragraph of the order dated 19.05.2016 the description of opposite party no.3
be read as Defence Estate Officer, 73 (F/F), Surya Nagar, Unit-VII, Bhubaneswar, Odisha instea
d of Defence Estate Officer, Gopalpur, Ganjam. The opposite party No.3 is directed to provide
money to opposite party no.4 in terms of the order dated 19.05.2016 by end of August 2016. The
 order dated 19.05.2016 is modified to the above extent only by keeping the rest part of the o
rder unaltered.

¶5

 The misc. case is accordingly disposed of.
 A free copy of the order be handed over to learned Asst. Solicitor General app
earing for opposite party no.3.

D.Kasi Rao v. Collector,Ganjam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Kasi Rao v. Collector,Ganjam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Ananda Chandra Sahoo Vs State of Odisha

Samir Ku.Nayak Vs Spl.Land Acquisition

Nilamadhab Deo Vs Collector,Khurda

D.Tarinayya Alias D.Taremeya Vs Collector,Ganjam

P.Madhusudan Rao Vs Collector,Ganjam

Bipra Charan Sahu Vs Collector,Ganjam