Allowed

P.Madhusudan Rao v. Collector,Ganjam

Orissa HC19 May 2016WP(C)/2059/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed a miscellaneous application to modify the cause title and an earlier order dated 19.05.2016 to correct the address of opposite party no.3 from Gopalpur-On-Sea to Bhubaneswar, treating the error as inadvertent. The court directed the opposite party to provide money by August 2016.

What did the court decide?

The cause title and the order dated 19.05.2016 were modified to reflect the correct address of opposite party no.3 as Defence Estate Officer, 73 (F/F), Surya Nagar, Unit-VII, Bhubaneswar, Odisha.

P.Madhusudan Rao Vs Collector,Ganjam — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Orissa HC (2016)

¶1

W.P.C NO.2059 OF 2016

¶2

 Misc. Case No.9940 of 2016
 24.06.2016

¶3

 This application has been filed for modification of the order dated 19.05.2016.
 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advoca
te and learned Asst. Solicitor General for opposite party no.3.
 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the address of opposite
party no.3 has been wrongly mentioned in the cause title of the writ petition as Asst. Defence
 Estate Officer, Gopalpur-On-Sea, Dist-Ganjam instead of Defence Estate Officer, 73 (F/F), Sur
ya Nagar, Unit-VII, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, the said wrong address has been reflected in paragrap
h-4 of the order dated 19.05.2016. She further submits that the same being an inadvertent one,
 she may be permitted to correct the cause title and the order dated 19.05.2016 may be correct
ed accordingly.

¶4

 Prayer is allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct
 the description of opposite party no.3 in the cause title of the writ petition in Court today
. In 4th paragraph of the order dated 19.05.2016 the description of opposite party no.3
be read as Defence Estate Officer, 73 (F/F), Surya Nagar, Unit-VII, Bhubaneswar, Odisha instea
d of Defence Estate Officer, Gopalpur, Ganjam. The opposite party No.3 is directed to provide
money to opposite party no.4 in terms of the order dated 19.05.2016 by end of August 2016. The
 order dated 19.05.2016 is modified to the above extent only by keeping the rest part of the o
rder unaltered.

¶5

 The misc. case is accordingly disposed of.
 A free copy of the order be handed over to learned Asst. Solicitor General app
earing for opposite party no.3.

¶6

 K.R. Mohapatra, J.

P.Madhusudan Rao v. Collector,Ganjam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Madhusudan Rao v. Collector,Ganjam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ananda Chandra Sahoo Vs State of Odisha

Samir Ku.Nayak Vs Spl.Land Acquisition

Nilamadhab Deo Vs Collector,Khurda

D.Kasi Rao Vs Collector,Ganjam

D.Tarinayya Alias D.Taremeya Vs Collector,Ganjam

Bipra Charan Sahu Vs Collector,Ganjam