This Single Judge bench dismissed the writ petition held to be infructuous as the term of the Grama Panchayat had expired and the underlying No Confidence Motion no longer had practical legal consequences.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. (C) No.18256 of 2010
02.11.2016
None appears for the petitioner. Learned Addl. Govt. Advocate is present.
This matter relates to a No Confidence Motion moved in 2010. The term of the Grama
Panchayat is over since 2012. The prayer in the writ petition has therefore become infructuou
s by efflux of time. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking remedy on a No Confidence Motion is maintainable after the efflux of time since the expiry of the Panchayat term?
Whether the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous due to the term of the Grama Panchayat ending in 2012?
Petitioner
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court