The Delhi High Court dismissed a miscellaneous case seeking to modify the name of the opposite party in a final order, noting the lack of merit as the application is no longer tenable post-finalization.
The miscellaneous case is dismissed with liberty to file a separate application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 17048 of 2016
Misc. Case No. 17048 of 2016
09.03.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Addl. Standing Counsel.
The application for modification of the name of opposite party no.2 cannot be allowe
d at this stage after passing of the final order. Hence, the Misc. Case does not have any meri
t.
The Misc. Case is accordingly dismissed.
The petitioner may renew his prayer in a separate application.
JS Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ... S.K.Mishra, J.
2
petitioner
opposite party no.2
S.K.Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court