Dismissed

[email protected] v. State of Orissa

Orissa HC21 Dec 2016ABLAPL/16173/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court heard an anticipatory bail application filed after apprehension of arrest in an IPC Section 380 theft case. Anticipatory bail was declined, but liberty to surrender and apply for bail was granted with a strict timeline.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail denied; Liberty granted to surrender within 21 days and apply for bail; Magistrate to consider bail application in first hour; Higher forum to follow next if rejected, maintaining pr

Danalu@D.Srikant Vs State of Orissa — Cheque Dishonour | Orissa HC (2016)

¶1

ABLAPL No.16173 of 2016
21.12.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Standing C
ounsel.

¶2

 The petitioner is apprehending arrest for the alleged commission of offence un
der Section 380 of the IPC in G.R. Case No.295 of 2016 of the court of learned S.D.J.M., Rayag
ada, arising out of Rayagada P.S. Case No.143 of 2016.
 Keeping in view the nature of allegations and the facts of the case, this Cour
t is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, keeping in view the s
ubmission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is given liberty to s
urrender before the learned S.D.J.M., Rayagada in the aforesaid case in first hour within twen
ty-one working days hence and file an application for bail. On such event, the learned Magistr
ate shall consider his application for bail in the first hour. In case of rejection of the bai
l application, the petitioner may move for bail before the higher forum in the second hour. On
 such event, the higher forum shall consider and dispose of the bail application of the petiti
oner on the same day by maintaining principles of parity, if applicable.

¶3

 Case Diary be made available to the concerned court. Records be transmitted by
 the learned S.D.J.M., Rayagada to the higher forum at the cost of the petitioner, if applied
for.

¶4

 The ABLAPL is disposed of accordingly.

¶5

 Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

¶6

 S.K. Mishra, J

¶7

[email protected] v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

[email protected] v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niranjan Sahu Vs State of Orissa

Abhaya Kumar Nayak Vs State of Orissa

Fulamani Behera Vs Collector,Angul

Kalandi Gaya Vs State of Orissa

Radheshayam Dhandhania Vs State of Odisha

N.C.E.D. Vs State