Dismissed
Pratap Ch.Routray v. State
Orissa HCWP(C)/13870/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2006 04. 18.08.2016 No one is present on…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C). No. 13870 of 2006
04. 18.08.2016 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even on revised
call.
Having heard learned Addl. Standing Counsel appearing for the State-opposite p
arties and on perusal of record, we are of the opinion that in the facts of the case, prayer m
ade in this case does not deserve to be granted in writ jurisdiction.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
........
( VINEET SARAN )
CHIEF JUSTICE
....
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
dm
-2-
Petitioner
State
Opposite Parties
VINEET SARAN
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court