Dismissed
Kasinath Jena v. State
Orissa HCOJC/6657/1991
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition on the merits after the petitioners were absent on a revised call. The Court opined that the prayer in the petition did not deserve to be granted in writ jurisdiction based on a perusal of the record.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
OJC No. 6657 of 1991
08. 17.08.2016 No one is present on behalf of the petitioners even on revised
call.
¶2
Having heard learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State-oppos
ite parties and on perusal of record, we are of the opinion that in the facts of the case, pra
yer made in this case does not deserve to be granted in writ jurisdiction.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
¶3
.......
( VINEET SARAN )
¶4
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
dm
¶5
-2-
Coram
AI extract
Vineet Saran
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court