Md.Ejaj Hussain v. Tata Motors Finance
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was disposed of as withdrawn. Counsel for the petitioner filed a memo to withdraw the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.1253 of 2013
12.08.2016 In view of the cessation of the Court work as per the resolution dated 11.08.2016 of t
he High Court Bar Association, neither the learned counsel for the petitioner nor the learned
counsel for the State is present.
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo to withdraw the writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
S. K. Sahoo, J.
S. K. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court