Dismissed
Hikoka v. Tahasildar
Orissa HCOJC/6275/1996
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This writ petition challenging the rejection of permission for a Tribe person to sell land was dismissed as the petitioner could approach the competent authority afresh.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed for having no merit.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
O.J.C No.6275 of 1996
¶2
4 02.12. 2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Government Advocate.
¶3
This writ petition has been filed assailing the order of rejection seeking permi
ssion by a Tribe person for sale of the land. Perused the impugned order. This Court does not
find any reason assigned in the order rejecting the prayer for permission to sale the lan
d. Be that as it may, there is no impediment for the petitioner in approaching the competent
authority for permission afresh. For the reasons assigned in Annexure-3 and since petitioner
still has chance to apply for a fresh permission, this Court is not inclined to interfere in t
he impugned order. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for having no merit.
¶4
BISWANATH RATH,J.
¶5
sks
¶6
-2-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the High Court should interfere with the order rejecting permission for the sale of land held by a Tribe person.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Additional Government Advocate
Coram
AI extract
BISWANATH RATH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court