The petitioner failed to appear. The core dispute concerned suspension as Sarapanch, but the court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the Sarapanch term had expired.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04. 20.10.2016 None appears for the petitioner.
The order challenged in this writ petition is suspension of a petitioner as Sa
rapanch vide order dtd.18.07.2000.
The term of the Sarapanch having been over in the meantime, the writ petition
has become infructucous by efflux of time. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infr
uctuous.
C.R. Dash, J.
Balaram
Balaram
C.R. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court