Harihar Maharana v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This court disposed of a writ petition challenging amendments to Sections 122 and 123 of the Orissa Grama Panchayat Act, holding them ultra vires Article 243(g) as previously decided in Fakirmohan Das.
What did the court decide?
Orders made under amended Sections 122 & 123 are held not in conformity with Article 243(g) of the Constitution; writ application disposed of.
What the court decided
W.P.(C). NO. 2072 of 2005
04. 19.10.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Addl. Go
vernment Advocate.
The petitioners in this writ application have challenged the legality of the O
rder No.16017, dated 18.10.2004 of the Govt. of Odisha in P.R. (G.P.) Department and all subse
quent orders passed on the subject of Amendment of Sections 122 & 123 of Orissa Grama Panchaya
t Act, 1964 (Annexures- 4 & 5).
The question is no more res integra. This Court, in the case of Fakirmohan Das
and others vs. Government of Orissa and others including a batch of cases reported in 106 (20
08) CLT 416 has held that the amendment to Section- 122 (3) is ultra vires of the Constitution
and Orders made under the amended provisions in the Sections 122 & 123 are not in conformity
with Article 243 (g) of the Constitution.
As the matter is no more res integra, the present writ application is also dis
posed of on the same analogy as arrived at in the case of Fakirmohan Das and others (supra). O
rders made under the amended provisions in the Sections 122 & 123 vide Annexures- 4 & 5 are he
ld to be not in conformity with provisions of Article- 243 (g) of the Constitution.
The writ application is accordingly disposed of.
.
C.R. Dash, J.
Subha
2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the amended provisions of Sections 122 and 123 of the Orissa Grama Panchayat Act, 1964 are in conformity with Article 243(g) of the Constitution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioners
- respondent
Government of Odisha
Coram
C.R. Dash
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court