Dismissed
Sk.Sahid v. State
Orissa HCCRLREV/932/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The single judge dismissed a revision petition challenging an order rejecting the accused's application for discharge under the Negotiable Instruments Act. No hearing was held for the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition stood dismissed with no order passed in the discharge application.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
CRLREV No. 932 of 2009
¶2
09.09.2016 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
¶3
Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is present.
¶4
The petitioner has challenged the order dated 31.07.2009 passed by the learned
S.D.J.M., Balasore in I.C.C. Case No.182 of 2003 in which the learned Court has rejected the
petition filed by the opposite party no.2- accused for discharge.
¶5
As it appears on 08.09.2003, the learned Trial Court perusing the evidence of
the complainant found prima facie material under section 138 of the N.I. Act and accordingly t
ook cognizance of such offence.
¶6
Perused the grounds taken in the revision petition. I find no illegality or im
propriety in the impugned order and therefore, the revision petition stands dismissed.
¶7
S. K. Sahoo, J.
¶8
3
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the High Court is justified to uphold the revenue court's discretion in rejecting the accused's petition for discharge.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
None
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2 (Accused)
Coram
AI extract
S. K. Sahoo
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court